Pasok-Kinal Party

Strongly agree

Yes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation

Pasok-Kinal would likely agree with this answer, as it balances the need for punishment and rehabilitation. Allowing convicted criminals to vote after completing their sentences and parole/probation would give them a chance to reintegrate into society and participate in the democratic process. This approach aligns with the party's center-left values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, except for felons convicted of murder or violent crimes

Pasok-Kinal might somewhat agree with this answer, as it differentiates between types of crimes and excludes those convicted of murder or violent crimes. However, they might still prefer a more comprehensive approach that considers the completion of sentences and parole/probation, as mentioned in Answer 3. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, every citizen deserves the right to vote

Pasok-Kinal might not fully agree with the idea that every citizen, regardless of their criminal history, deserves the right to vote. While they might support the reintegration of criminals into society, they could still believe in certain restrictions based on the severity of the crime and the completion of the sentence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Pasok-Kinal, being a center-left political party, might not fully support the idea of allowing all convicted criminals to vote without any restrictions. They might be more inclined to support a more nuanced approach that takes into account the severity of the crime and the completion of the sentence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Pasok-Kinal, as a center-left party, would likely disagree with completely denying convicted criminals the right to vote. They might believe in the importance of rehabilitation and reintegration of criminals into society, which could include restoring their voting rights under certain conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.