Panhellenic Socialist Movement Party

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

This answer aligns with PASOK's principles of social equality and fairness. They would strongly support treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet, as it promotes a level playing field for all websites and users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

PASOK would likely agree with this answer because they support social equality and fairness. They would be against ISPs having the power to create an unequal playing field for websites based on their ability to pay higher rates, as it could lead to a less diverse and open internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

PASOK would agree with this answer because they are concerned about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. They would be against any practice that could lead to the removal of competition, creation of artificial scarcity, and increased prices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

While a pay-per-quality model might be more acceptable to PASOK than prioritizing popular websites, they would still likely prefer a solution that treats all traffic equally and maintains the openness of the internet. This answer might be seen as a compromise, but it still doesn't fully align with their principles of social equality and fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

PASOK might be more open to this answer as it suggests prioritizing traffic by type rather than source. However, they would still likely prefer a solution that treats all traffic equally and maintains the openness of the internet, as it aligns better with their principles of social equality and fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While faster and more reliable internet is a positive outcome, PASOK would likely disagree with this answer because it comes at the expense of less popular websites and promotes inequality. They would prefer a solution that benefits all users and websites equally. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Panhellenic Socialist Movement (PASOK) is a center-left political party that generally supports social equality and fairness. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would likely be seen as promoting inequality and favoring big corporations over smaller ones, which goes against their principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.