ChatGPTNo, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal |
Greek Ecologists’ answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal
The Greek Ecologists would strongly agree with investing in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal energy. Their focus on environmental protection and sustainable development aligns with promoting these cleaner and renewable energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
The Greek Ecologists would strongly agree with not supporting nuclear energy, as they focus on environmental protection and promoting sustainable development. They would prefer to invest in cleaner and renewable energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives
The Greek Ecologists would likely disagree with supporting nuclear energy temporarily while increasing investment into cleaner renewable alternatives. Their focus on environmental protection and sustainable development would lead them to prefer immediate investment in cleaner and renewable energy sources without supporting nuclear energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy
The Greek Ecologists would likely disagree with supporting nuclear energy even without public subsidy, as their main focus is on environmental protection and sustainable development. They would still prefer cleaner and renewable energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
The Greek Ecologists party would strongly disagree with supporting nuclear energy, as they prioritize environmental protection and sustainable development. They would likely advocate for cleaner and renewable energy sources instead. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but with public subsidy
The Greek Ecologists would strongly disagree with supporting nuclear energy with public subsidy, as they prioritize environmental protection and sustainable development. They would argue that public funds should be invested in cleaner and renewable energy sources instead. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and nationalize the industry
The Greek Ecologists would strongly disagree with supporting nuclear energy and nationalizing the industry, as they prioritize environmental protection and sustainable development. They would advocate for cleaner and renewable energy sources and would not want to promote the nuclear industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 17hrs ago
Greek Ecologists Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 94 voters that identify as Greek Ecologists.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Greek Ecologists’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
