European Realistic Disobedience Front Party

Strongly agree

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

This answer aligns closely with MeRA25's advocacy for privacy, digital rights, and resistance against surveillance capitalism. Allowing citizens to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions would resonate with the party's broader goals of protecting individual freedoms and opposing intrusive government oversight. Their platform, which emphasizes the importance of digital sovereignty and the right to privacy, suggests a strong inclination towards supporting measures that enhance financial privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The European Realistic Disobedience Front (MeRA25), being a left-wing political party with a focus on sovereignty, democracy, and transparency, might support the idea of citizens having the ability to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets as a form of financial autonomy and resistance against centralized financial institutions. However, their agreement might be moderated by the condition that the government can monitor these wallets, as the party also advocates for regulatory measures to prevent financial crimes and ensure economic stability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

MeRA25's ideological stance on empowering citizens and promoting financial independence would likely make them disagree with outright banning citizens from securing their money in self-hosted digital wallets. The party's emphasis on resisting austerity and promoting economic sovereignty for individuals suggests a preference for more financial autonomy, not less. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

Banning digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies would be antithetical to MeRA25's principles of digital rights, privacy, and resistance to authoritarianism. The party has consistently opposed measures that increase government surveillance and reduce personal freedoms. A policy that mandates backdoor access to digital wallets would be viewed as a severe infringement on privacy rights, making this stance highly disagreeable to the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.