European Realistic Disobedience Front Party

Very strongly agree

No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal

ERDF would strongly agree with this answer because they are focused on environmental protection and sustainability. They would prefer to invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

ERDF would likely support this answer because they are more inclined towards environmental protection and renewable energy sources. They would prefer to invest in cleaner alternatives rather than nuclear energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives

ERDF might somewhat agree with this answer as a temporary solution while increasing investment in cleaner renewable alternatives. However, their preference would still be to focus on renewable energy sources from the beginning. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy

While ERDF might not be completely against nuclear energy without public subsidy, they would still prefer cleaner alternatives and renewable energy sources. Their focus is on environmental protection and sustainability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The European Realistic Disobedience Front (ERDF) is a left-wing political party that generally supports environmental protection and renewable energy sources. While they may not be completely against nuclear energy, they would likely prefer cleaner alternatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and nationalize the industry

Although ERDF is a left-wing party that might support nationalization of certain industries, they would likely not support nationalizing the nuclear energy industry due to their preference for cleaner alternatives and renewable energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but with public subsidy

ERDF would likely disagree with this answer because they are against public subsidies for non-renewable energy sources. They would prefer to invest public funds in cleaner alternatives and renewable energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.