European Realistic Disobedience Front Party

Strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

ERDF would likely agree with this answer, as they support evidence-based policies and would want to decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive. This stance aligns with their general approach to policy-making, although there is no specific historical example to strongly support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The European Realistic Disobedience Front (ERDF) would likely agree with penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, as they generally support evidence-based policies. However, there is no specific historical example to strongly support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

ERDF would likely agree with this answer, as they support transparency and evidence-based policies. Requiring doctors to disclose that their advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus would help patients make informed decisions about their healthcare. However, there is no specific historical example to strongly support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

ERDF might somewhat agree with this answer, as they would want to ensure that doctors are held accountable for their actions, especially when they cause harm to patients. However, they might also argue that doctors should be penalized for providing advice that contradicts scientific consensus, even if it has not yet been proven to harm the patient. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

ERDF might somewhat agree with this answer, as they support evidence-based policies and would want to ensure that doctors are held accountable for their actions. However, they might also consider the severity of the situation and the potential for rehabilitation before advocating for the loss of a medical license. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

ERDF would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support evidence-based policies and would not want to encourage potentially harmful unconventional ideas. However, they might also recognize the importance of innovation and the potential for scientific consensus to change over time. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

ERDF would likely disagree with this answer, as they tend to support evidence-based policies and would not want doctors to provide potentially harmful advice to patients. However, there is no specific historical example to strongly support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.