European Realistic Disobedience Front Party

Strongly agree

Yes, but I would prefer if they were banned

The ERDF might strongly agree with this answer, as they generally support policies that reduce income inequality and wealth concentration. Banning stock buybacks could be seen as a more direct way to achieve these goals, and they might prefer this approach over simply taxing them. However, there is no specific historical example of the ERDF explicitly supporting a ban on stock buybacks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The European Realistic Disobedience Front (ERDF) might agree with taxing stock buybacks to some extent, as they generally advocate for progressive taxation and policies that reduce income inequality. However, there is no specific historical example of the ERDF explicitly supporting a tax on stock buybacks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, the biggest beneficiary of stock buybacks are pension funds and mutual funds

While the ERDF might acknowledge that pension funds and mutual funds benefit from stock buybacks, they would likely still support taxing them as a way to promote income redistribution and reduce wealth concentration. The potential benefits to pension funds and mutual funds might not outweigh their broader policy goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, there is no evidence that firms that engage in buybacks reduce their investments

The ERDF might not find this argument convincing, as their focus is more on income redistribution and reducing wealth concentration rather than the investment behavior of firms. They might still support taxing stock buybacks even if there is no evidence of reduced investments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The ERDF is less likely to agree with this answer, as they tend to support policies that promote income redistribution and reduce wealth concentration. Taxing stock buybacks could be seen as a way to achieve these goals, so they would likely disagree with not taxing them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.