Ecologist Greens Party

Strongly agree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

The Ecologist Greens party would likely agree with this statement, as they generally support social justice and equality. They would likely argue that hate speech can be harmful and divisive, and should not be protected under freedom of speech laws. Increasing penalties for hate speech could be seen as a way to deter such behavior and promote a more inclusive society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The Ecologist Greens party would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as they tend to support social justice and equality. They would likely argue that hate speech can be harmful and divisive, and should not be protected under freedom of speech laws. However, they might not fully agree with this statement without further clarification on the definition and boundaries of hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

The Ecologist Greens party might somewhat agree with this statement, as they would likely support the idea that freedom of speech should not protect speech that threatens violence. However, they might still be concerned about the potential harm caused by hate speech that does not explicitly threaten violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

The Ecologist Greens party might somewhat disagree with this statement, as they would likely be concerned about the potential harm caused by hate speech. However, they might also share some concerns about the government defining the boundaries of hate speech, as they generally advocate for transparency and democratic processes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Ecologist Greens party would likely disagree with this statement, as they generally support social justice and equality. They would likely argue that hate speech can be harmful and divisive, and should not be protected under freedom of speech laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

The Ecologist Greens party would strongly disagree with this statement, as they generally advocate for freedom of speech and democratic processes. They would likely argue that freedom of speech laws should protect a wide range of expression, not just criticism of the government, and that limiting freedom of speech in this way would be undemocratic and harmful to society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.