Try the political quiz

Parties  ›  Policies  ›  Economic

Coalition of the Radical Left - Unitary Social Front Party

The Greek Coalition of the Radical Left - Unitary Social Front, commonly known by its acronym SYRIZA, is a political party in Greece that emerged from a coalition of left-wing and radical left groups. It was founded in 2004 as a synthesis of various political…  Read more

Overview Policies Themes Ideology Discuss

Coalition of the Radical Left - Unitary Social Front’s policy on bonus cap

Filters

Topics

Should bankers’ bonuses be capped at 100% of their pay?

  ChatGPTYes, and nationalise the banks

Coalition of the Radical Left - Unitary Social Front’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, and nationalise the banks

Nationalizing the banks aligns perfectly with Syriza's far-left ideology and their platform of increasing state control over key sectors of the economy to ensure greater economic equality and stability. This measure would be seen as an ultimate tool to control the financial sector and redistribute wealth more equitably. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and lower the cap to 20%

This answer aligns closely with Syriza's ideological stance on economic issues, advocating for significant restrictions on the financial sector's compensation practices to address income inequality. Lowering the cap to 20% would be seen as a strong move towards economic justice, which is a core part of their platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Coalition of the Radical Left - Unitary Social Front Party (Syriza) generally supports policies that aim to reduce income inequality and regulate the financial sector more strictly. Capping bankers' bonuses at 100% of their pay aligns with their broader economic justice goals, although they might prefer more aggressive measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and lower the cap to 50%

While Syriza would likely support the idea of capping bankers' bonuses to reduce inequality, a 50% cap might be seen as a compromise position. They would probably prefer more stringent measures but still view this as a step in the right direction. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Syriza's political platform is based on opposing neoliberal policies and reducing the influence of the financial sector on the economy. They would strongly disagree with leaving bankers' bonuses uncapped, as this would be seen as perpetuating economic inequalities and the excesses of capitalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, any worker should be rewarded based on their success

Syriza's political ideology is fundamentally opposed to the notion that workers in the financial sector should receive unlimited rewards based on 'success,' especially when such success can contribute to economic disparities and instability. They would strongly disagree with this laissez-faire approach to compensation in the banking sector. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 4hrs ago

Party’s support base

Coalition of the Radical Left - Unitary Social Front Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: Least Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 87 voters that identify as Coalition of the Radical Left - Unitary Social Front.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Coalition of the Radical Left - Unitary Social Front’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.

Popular conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3mos3MO

AOC Sparks Backlash After Ditching Gender Pronouns

Famously progressive Democrat congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez raised eyebrows by removing her pronouns from her X account. The move from Squad lawmaker, 35, seen as one of the most liberal members of Congress, was seen by some as a sign that the cultural tide is turning following Donald Trump's election win. Journalist Benjamin Ryan said records showed AOC removed her 'she/her' pronouns sometime between August 3, 2023, and May 28, 2024. Critics branded her a hypocrite, and noted that just two years ago AOC apologized to followers for not having pronouns in her Instagram bio, claiming they 'fell off' and she didn't realize. Conservatives were quick to mock AOC after it was realized that she had removed the pronouns from her account bio. Some also noted that she changed her moniker from the genderless 'Representative' to 'Congresswoman' as she removed her pronouns. Ocasio-Cortez has long been a supporter of transgender rights, including so-called gender-affirming care for children, and transgender girls competing in female sports.But the Democrats more extreme stances were blamed as a massive vote loser for Kamala Harris in the recent election.An advert showing her supporting taxpayer-funded gender reassignment surgeries for illegal migrant prisoners was played on repeat by Team Trump.Many Dems' insistence that opposing hormones for trans children or banning trans girls from joining female sports teams was transphobic further alienated centrists.Immigration and inflation were the issues that ultimately swung the election for Donald Trump, but the Dems' unpopular trans stance has now forced a reckoning within the party.

▲  2117 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…1 day1D

Trump Targets FAA Diversity Programs In Crash Aftermath

Trump made controversial claims linking diversity initiatives at the FAA to a deadly Potomac River collision that killed 67 people, despite acknowledging he had no evidence to support these assertions.The disability recruitment program Trump criticized actually began during his own administration in April 2019, with the FAA launching a pilot program for 20 people with targeted disabilities to work in air traffic operations.Experts, including Tennessee Garvey from the Organization of Black Aerospace Professionals, stated that no aviation incident has ever been attributed to diversity initiatives as a cause or contributing factor.The federal policy for hiring people with disabilities dates back to the Bush administration in 2003 and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which was initially created to protect veterans with disabilities.FAA workforce diversity has shown minimal changes over recent years: white male representation decreased from 58.9% in 2016 to 55.3% in 2023, while employees with targeted disabilities increased from 0.7% to 2%.The aviation industry's diversity efforts were primarily driven by labor shortages and the need to fill positions as pilots retire, rather than purely demographic goals.All candidates, regardless of background or disability status, must meet the same rigorous standards for aptitude, medical qualifications, and security clearances.Historical barriers, including segregation, prevented Black aviation professionals from entering the industry until the civil rights movement and subsequent lawsuits.The Biden administration has continued similar diversity initiatives, with slight increases in representation across different demographic groups.A pending lawsuit filed by a conservative legal organization claims discrimination against applicants due to Obama-era hiring practices, though the case hasn't been resolved.

▲  179 replies