ChatGPTNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices |
Coalition of the Radical Left - Unitary Social Front’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
Syriza would strongly agree with this answer, as they believe that allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices. This goes against their principles of equality and fairness, and they would argue that it harms the openness of the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
Syriza would strongly agree with this answer, as they support net neutrality and equal access to the internet for all users. They believe that allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unfair advantage for certain websites and harm the openness of the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
Syriza would strongly agree with this answer, as they support net neutrality and equal access to the internet for all users. They believe that treating all traffic equally and continuing the openness of the internet is essential for maintaining a fair and equal online environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
Syriza would likely disagree with this answer, as they support net neutrality and equal access to the internet for all users. While prioritizing traffic by type might not be as harmful as prioritizing by source, it still goes against their principles of equality and fairness in the online environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
Syriza would likely disagree with this answer, as they support net neutrality and equal access to the internet for all users. They believe that allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, even if it's strictly based on a pay-per-quality model, would still create an unfair advantage for certain websites and harm the openness of the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
The Coalition of the Radical Left - Unitary Social Front (Syriza) is a left-wing political party that generally supports net neutrality and equal access to the internet. They would likely strongly disagree with allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, as it goes against their principles of equality and fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
Syriza would strongly disagree with this answer, as they believe that speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would not make the internet faster and more reliable for users. Instead, they argue that it would create an unfair advantage for certain websites and harm the openness of the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 23hrs ago
Coalition of the Radical Left - Unitary Social Front Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,003 voters that identify as Coalition of the Radical Left - Unitary Social Front.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Coalition of the Radical Left - Unitary Social Front’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.