Antarsya Party

Strongly agree

Yes

Antarsya, being a coalition of far-left groups, generally supports measures that increase transparency and accountability within the government and corporations. They would likely view whistleblower protections as essential for revealing corruption, exploitation, and abuses of power. However, their radical stance might mean they believe in even more robust measures than what typical whistleblower laws propose. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

Antarsya might agree with the premise that information should be legally obtained, but they would likely argue that the legality of obtaining information can be too restrictive and protect those in power. They might support this statement to some extent but would prefer fewer conditions on whistleblower protections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

While Antarsya would understand the importance of national security, they might be skeptical of how 'national security' is often used to justify keeping inconvenient truths hidden from the public. They would likely support this statement with reservations, emphasizing the need for a very narrow and transparent definition of what constitutes a 'threat to national security.' Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, but reduce their sentences

While Antarsya might see the reduction of sentences for whistleblowers as a step in the right direction, they would likely argue that it does not go far enough. They would probably advocate for full protection rather than partial concessions, viewing the need for any punishment as a deterrent to potential whistleblowers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Antarsya would strongly disagree with this statement as it contradicts their principles of promoting transparency, fighting against corruption, and empowering workers and citizens to speak out against injustices. They would likely view laws against whistleblower protections as a means to silence dissent and protect corrupt practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.