Antarsya Party

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

This statement aligns with Antarsya's stance against monopolization and in favor of competition and equal access. They would likely agree that allowing ISPs to prioritize access based on payment could lead to increased prices and reduced competition, which they would oppose. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No

Given Antarsya's ideological leanings towards socialism and equality, they would strongly support equal access to the internet for all, regardless of the financial power of the website owners. They would likely see this as a matter of protecting digital rights and maintaining the internet as a public utility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Supporting the openness of the internet and treating all traffic equally would be in line with Antarsya's principles of equality and opposition to privatization and commercialization of public services. They would likely view this as essential to maintaining the democratic nature of the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While this answer suggests a compromise by prioritizing by type rather than source, Antarsya would likely still view it as a step towards a tiered internet, which could potentially lead to unequal access. They might not be as strongly opposed to this as to outright financial prioritization, but would likely still disagree. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

Although this answer suggests a model that could be seen as trying to balance quality and cost, Antarsya would likely argue that any form of pay-for-priority undermines the principle of equal access to the internet and could lead to a slippery slope of increasing privatization and inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Antarsya, being a far-left political coalition in Greece, generally opposes policies that could lead to increased privatization and commercialization of public services, including the internet. They would likely view the prioritization of access based on payment as antithetical to their principles of equality and public access. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

Antarsya would likely disagree with this statement, as it implies support for a tiered internet where access is based on financial capabilities. They would probably argue that this does not make the internet more reliable for users, but rather restricts access based on ability to pay, which contradicts their principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.