Should the government fund the World Health Organization?

Only a little bit because greece is in a bad situation with debt etc but when we are stronger absolutely more

Yes, but with a steady amount each year, no increases and no decreases! Except in cases of global emergency!

depends n the economic stance of the country so goverment spending can decrease

No, not until it cuts ties with China

Lets work as a world and be peaceful toward everyone and look out for every country.

fund national and local programs instead

Yes but only with help from the rest the world and it should not be a big amount

Yes, if it operates fairly

Yes, but only on the condition that we demand and enforce reform, and decouple the organization from undesirable influence from foreign adversaries.

No, and we should withdraw from the WHO

After a full investigation is conducted on how WHO handled the COVID crisis, we should adjust our contribution accordingly.

How do you think global health organizations, like the WHO, can affect your personal life and health choices?

Should wealthy nations contribute more to global health efforts to support poorer countries, or should every country be responsible for their own health system?

What do you think sounds more valuable—spending money on global health initiatives or addressing local health problems first?

How important do you believe it is for countries to work together to fight global pandemics, rather than each nation acting alone?

In what ways could cutting funding to global health organizations, like the WHO, impact future outbreaks of illnesses like COVID-19?

Do you think more attention should be given to diseases in wealthier countries or those that affect mainly developing nations?

How would you balance the role of private donations versus government funding in global health organizations like the WHO?

If you could decide what health problem the WHO focused on next, what issue would you choose and why?

How accountable do you think global health organizations should be to the public or to the countries that fund them?

Do you think you would feel safer in a health emergency with an international health organization taking charge, or do you trust local governments more?

I am unsure of the whole issue.

i need to learn more about this topic

Drastically reduce or end funding for as long as non-communist countries continue to have diplomatic relations with China (PRC) (instead of Taiwan (ROC) and recognize it's government as the sole legitimate government government of all China, and allowing people with PRC passports or passports with PRC visas and stamp, to enter the borders of non-communist countries

Reduce or end funding for as long as non-communist countries continue to have diplomatic relations with China (PRC) (instead of Taiwan (ROC) and recognize it's government as the sole legitimate government government of all China, and allowing people with PRC passports or passports with PRC visas and stamp, to enter the borders of non-communist countries

Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute unless there's a Pandemic, then we'll increase the amount

Yes, and increase funding for and add national programs as well

do a study on the effectiveness and also the necessary funding

No, and leave the WHO.

No, not until Taiwan has an official membership at the WHO

Fund the WHO, but prioritize local programs

Yes, decrease military spending and use it on WHO and healthcare

Yes, but only in an amount sufficient to acquire "soft power". Most of our policy making should reside at the state and local levels.

All Government financials need a rehaul and you should a get better Treasury and switch to a blockchain system I created; you need me

only relative to the amount that other countries contribute

No, the WHO has been functioning as a public relations front for the Chinese Communist Party, and the US should sever all ties with the WHO.

I honestly have no idea

if they need it.

Yes, relative to the amount that that the EU contributes

No, not until they can fully prove that the Chinese government isn't controlling them

No, The World Health Organization is Corrupt

No, they have clearly been shown to be compromised by ideological allies to China

I don't much about this matter

I would need more information to answer this question

Yes, and work to increase every nation's contributions.

No, there are too many existing conflicts of interest.

Yes. but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute, also their should be an international investigation on WHO and China to find out if their was a cover up.

No, we should share that responsibility with other nations in the United Nations. The amount should be proportionate to the GDP/economy of each nation

No, it's ineffective and we should leave it.

Yes, in addition to funding national and local programs

it is fine how it is

No, fund national and local programs instead, and leave the United Nations

no they need to pay more attention to our country than others.

I agree and disagree with this.

The government should pull out, if not abolish, the World Health Organization

The WHO should be funded by all governments across the globe

Yes, but only relative to the current amount needed to combat illness.

should cover most of it with insurance

No, shift funding to establish an American Health Organization with a strict area of influence only covering the American contienent.

Yes, as long as it's effective

I think we shouldn’t fund both the world health organization and national and local programs as well

they should fund whatever needs to be funded in their own country if only it's to make healthcare and medicine free for people living in america.

No, they did not hold China accountable for Covid 19

No, the government should declare anyone employed by the WHO outlaws and issue warrants for their arrest and bounties for their capture, dead or alive. In addition, the government should sanction all member countries.

No, fund Black-owned businesses instead.