Should the government continue to fund Planned Parenthood?

How would you propose those against certain medical procedures still support broad healthcare initiatives?

What could be the long-term effects on a society that limits funding for healthcare services?

Imagine if health education and services were inaccessible: how might this change your community?

Why might someone argue that the government has a role in supporting healthcare services for the less privileged?

How does providing or restricting access to sexual health services affect a high school student’s future?

In what ways does reproductive healthcare impact men's lives, and how should this influence public funding?

If you or someone you know needed affordable healthcare, where would you expect to find help?

What values should determine the funding of healthcare services in our community?

How would you feel if a local health clinic that many depended on suddenly lost funding?

Planned parenthood should be considered free healthcare

Yes. As long as funding is not used for abortions besides for rape, incest, and danger to the mother, and if it is for rape, it should not be after a certain amount of time.

Yes, with the expectation that they will not use the money for abortions and that if they do, they will have their funding taken away.

Yes, but it should be determined by the States whether it is used for abortions.

Yes but that funding should be used to reduce the cost of procedures for those in low income households who need it.

No, because people that pay taxes have to pay for kids that are not there.

Yes, but put more restrictions on people who utilize it. If you cannot practice safe sex, then you shouldn't be receiving these services endlessly.

Yes because sometimes it can be pretty expensive when coming to take care of a child.

Yes- including funding abortions and many more health services that come from planned parenthood

Yes, as long as the funding is only used for certain services

No. Although I am pro-choice, I'm not a big fan of planned parenthood.

i personally dont feel like answering this question

Yes, but no funding for anything to do with gender reassignment. This issues should be handle by one's private health care providers.

Yes, but only state governments

Yes, and the government should not give funds to any organizations that perform abortions provide abortion counseling or referrals, advocate to decriminalize abortion, or expande abortion services

No, and the government should not give funds to any organizations that perform abortions, provide abortion counseling or referrals, advocate for decriminalizing abortion, or expand abortion services

Yes, but funding shouldn't be used for abortions unless it's rape, incest, or life-threatening situations, and only for mothers who are having financial issues. The government should focus more on funding programs rather than organizations.

We need Medicare For All before we can even have this discussion in a serious way.

No, keep it the at the same amount but don't cut it completely. Instead, the government should focus more on funding programs rather than organizations, and therefore should not be used for abortions unless it's rape, incest, or a risk to mother's life or health.

No, keep it the at the same amount but don't cut it completely. Instead, the government should focus more on funding programs rather than organizations, and therefore, should not be used for abortions unless it's rape, incest, or a risk to mother's life or health.

No, it should be funded less but not by completely cutting it. The government should focus more on funding programs rather than organizations, and therefore, should not be used for abortions unless it's rape, incest, or a risk to mother or child's life.

No, funding should be reduced but not by completely cutting it. The government should focus more on funding programs rather than organizations, and therefore, should not be used for abortions, unless it's rape, incest, or a risk to mother or child's life.

Yes, but not for anything that leads to abortion unless its rape, incest, or a threat to the child and/or mother's life. Other than that, the government should focus on funding programs rather than organizations.

Yes, but not for anything that leads to abortion unless its rape, incest, or a threat to the child and/or mother's life. Otherwise, the government should focus on funding programs rather than organizations.

indifferent on this issue

This question is very broad. There are some things I like about plant parent hood, and others I despise.

Yes, but additional funding must be directed towards early fetal viability research to allow more children to survive outside of the womb, and therefore avoid death from abortion.

yes it is a safe matter and they need to be funded

yes, but only if they dont have the money for it

Yes, but only after a full audit

Absolutely not! 1. Abortion have been a decrease in the population a couple years after roe v wade. 2. Some government officials( mainly Democrat) support abortion for votes. 3 minorities are hurt first and worse to abortion. Over 330,000 African American baby’s are abort every single year.

No, protect abortion rights nation wide but let each state choose how much money is used to fund Planned Parenthood

Yes and No there is certain things they should keep ans certain things they should do away with.

No, because there is too much controversy and no one can agree or be happy with either option. So allow them to be privately funded or funded by people as a non-profit, because plenty of people will donate to keep them serving the public and then you don't have to worry about the political disagreement getting in the way of their work.

If there are more important things we can fund than fund those but if not then yes.

Yes, free and easy access to abortion clinics, and healthcare in general, will make it easier for women to abort their fetuses before they become developed enough that abortion would be an unethical option.

I think based on how much the parents are making, should decided weather or not they get funded.

No, The government should go even further and ban any institution that murders the unborn.

I think yes, but no if you plan on getting an abortion

No, The government should go even farther than defunding Planned Parenthood and ban it altogether.